Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS

★★★★☆ 4.2 (1,152)

{ "review": "光学系にFLD6枚、SLD2枚、非球面3枚を搭載し、HLA駆動AFと7.5段手ブレ補正が開放F2.8の高画質を支える。防塵防滴の軽量176gボディに加え、レンズケースやフィルターキットが同梱され、すぐに撮影へ持ち出せる。マクロ性能は79点と控えめだが、旅行スコア100点の機動力を活かし、屋外スポーツやポートレートを軽快に撮るプロフェッショナルに最適。" }

Focal length 70-200mm
Aperture f/22
Mount Sony E
stabilization はい
Weather Sealed はい
Weight 1345 g
af type HSM
lens type zoom
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS lens
67 総合スコア
他の国でも利用可能:

概要

オーナーの声

購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか

独自

顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。

購入者の評価は一定を保っています
85/100当社のAIによる感情分析信頼度: 高 · 118 件のソース · 2026年6月
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '19: 5.0★ · 4 レビューQ2 '19: 4.8★ · 8 レビューQ3 '19: 5.0★ · 3 レビューQ4 '19: 5.0★ · 4 レビューQ1 '20: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ2 '20: 4.0★ · 1 レビューQ3 '20: 4.9★ · 8 レビューQ4 '20: 4.9★ · 7 レビューQ1 '21: 5.0★ · 3 レビューQ2 '21: 4.7★ · 3 レビューQ3 '21: 5.0★ · 4 レビューQ4 '21: 4.8★ · 4 レビューQ1 '22: 5.0★ · 6 レビューQ2 '22: 4.0★ · 2 レビューQ1 '23: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ3 '23: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ1 '24: 5.0★ · 3 レビューQ2 '24: 5.0★ · 2 レビューQ3 '24: 5.0★ · 3 レビューQ4 '24: 5.0★ · 3 レビューQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ3 '25: 5.0★ · 6 レビューQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 3 レビューQ3 '26: 5.0★ · 2 レビュー4834118733446211132331166532Q1 '19Q4 '19Q3 '20Q2 '21Q1 '22Q3 '23Q2 '24Q1 '25Q4 '25Q3 '26
平均評価満足(4〜5★)不満(1〜2★)バーの高さ = レビュー件数
  1. Q2 2026100/1005.0★3 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for its sharpness in sports photography and excellent value compared to Sony alternatives.

    • Crisp image quality for sports like baseball and soccer.
    • Great value, much cheaper than Sony 70-200 with similar quality.
    • No complaints reported; overall satisfaction is high.
  2. Q1 2026100/1005 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for fast, accurate autofocus, smooth video performance, and high build quality. One review focuses solely on the lens hood.

    • Fast and accurate autofocus, even wide open at 200mm.
    • Excellent for video: smooth zoom, parfocal, good stabilization.
    • High build quality with smooth zoom and focus rings.
    • One review is only about the lens hood, not the lens itself.
  3. Q4 2025100/1006 レビュー

    All six verified buyers in Q4 2025 praised the lens for sharpness, autofocus, stabilization, and value. No negative feedback was reported.

    • Image quality and sharpness are excellent, with vibrant colors and crisp results.
    • Autofocus and stabilization are quick and effective, praised for sports and astrophotography.
    • Internal zoom and video exposure stability are appreciated, especially for racing and video work.
    • Value for money is high; lens is considered affordable for its performance and features.
  4. Q3 202590/1005.0★6 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for its superb build and optical quality, fast autofocus, and excellent low-light performance, though they note it is heavy.

    • Superb mechanical and optical quality, often preferred over Nikon.
    • Fast and precise autofocus, including continuous tracking for moving subjects.
    • Excellent low-light performance and great for sports photography.
    • Heavy build, but weight is expected and considered acceptable.
  5. Q4 202467/1005.0★3 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for its sharpness, speed, and value, but note significant weight and a non-removable tripod ring as drawbacks.

    • Excellent image quality, fast focusing, and great value for the price.
    • Lens is very heavy, causing fatigue during extended handheld use.
    • Tripod ring is not removable, adding to bulk.
    • Zoom ring rotates opposite to Sony lenses, requiring adjustment.
  6. Q3 202467/1005.0★3 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for its quality, affordability, and fast autofocus, comparing it favorably to Canon glass for most uses.

    • Excellent value and quality, matching or exceeding Canon equivalents.
    • Fast and reliable autofocus, ideal for sports and action photography.
    • Versatile across multiple camera systems, including DSLRs and Blackmagic URSA.
    • One user noted it may not be technically superior to Canon but performs well in practice.
  7. Q1 202483/1005.0★3 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for sharpness and versatility across sports, weddings, and portraits, but note significant weight causing physical strain during long shoots.

    • Sharp image quality and versatile focal lengths for various photography types.
    • Heavy weight causes soreness after extended use, especially during weddings.
    • One verified buyer gave 0 stars but text says lens works good; possible rating error.
  8. Q1 202295/1005.0★6 レビュー

    Buyers praise this Sigma 70-200mm as a top-tier alternative to Canon, highlighting excellent image quality, stabilization, and value.

    • Excellent image quality with great compression and sharpness.
    • Effective stabilization system, especially in low light.
    • Great value compared to Canon version, with solid build.
    • Heavy but expected for a premium lens; some note Canon may have better AF/color.
  9. Q4 202185/1004.8★4 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens as well-built and sharp, with fast autofocus and good value. Some noted softness at full zoom and weight.

    • Build quality and sharpness praised as 'rock solid'.
    • Softness at full zoom and f/2.8 noted by one buyer.
    • Good value compared to Canon, about half the price.
    • Heavy for long use, mitigated by a strap.
  10. Q3 2021100/1005.0★4 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for sports and video, highlighting fantastic autofocus, top-notch build quality, and durability, though noted it is heavy for handheld use.

    • Autofocus performance is fantastic for video.
    • Build quality is top-notch and durable.
    • Lens is heavy, giving a workout during handheld use.
    • Great for sports and a go-to lens choice.
  11. Q2 202180/1004.7★3 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens as pro quality at a lower cost, with excellent image stabilization and sharp results. One noted a focusing issue where it briefly hunts and bounces.

    • Pro quality at a fraction of the cost
    • Excellent image stabilization, sharp handheld shots at slow speeds
    • Weight is noticeable but not a problem during use
    • Focusing can hunt and bounce, causing brief delay
  12. Q1 2021100/1005.0★3 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens as a great value, sharp, fast, and versatile for sports and portraits.

    • Excellent value for the price, offering high performance.
    • Sharp and fast, suitable for sports and environmental portraits.
    • Versatile lens, used by one buyer with ten units.
    • Large but feels great to use, with a unique character.
  13. Q4 202093/1004.9★7 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, fast AF, and value versus OEM brands, but consistently note its heavy weight.

    • Excellent sharpness and fast autofocus performance.
    • Great value compared to Canon, Sony, or Nikon equivalents.
    • Heavy and bulky, but accepted for the build and image quality.
    • Versatile for sports, portraits, and other photography genres.
  14. Q3 202088/1004.9★8 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for sports, portraits, and value, though some noted it is heavy and autofocus can struggle in action.

    • Great for sports, portraits, and close-ups with fast focus and sharpness.
    • Excellent value compared to pricier Nikon version.
    • Heavy weight noted; some find it difficult to carry, others accept it as typical.
    • Autofocus occasionally misses or struggles in action shots.
  15. Q4 2019100/1005.0★4 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, fast autofocus, and robust build. It excels for sports and video, though some note weight and non-removable tripod mount.

    • Sharp, fast autofocus, and excellent color capture for sports and video.
    • Heavy and tripod mount non-removable, but performance outweighs these issues.
    • Built like a tank, durable and well-constructed.
    • Lens dock customization improves sharpness and performance.
  16. Q3 2019100/1005.0★3 レビュー

    Buyers praise the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 for sharpness, fast autofocus, and solid build, noting it rivals OEM lenses at a lower price. The weight is a minor drawback.

    • Sharp images even at f/2.8, end to end.
    • Fast and accurate autofocus, handles challenging subjects like hummingbirds.
    • Excellent value compared to more expensive OEM alternatives.
    • Heavy at nearly 4 pounds, but manageable.
  17. Q2 201988/1004.8★8 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, fast autofocus, and value versus Nikon/Canon. Weight is a common drawback, and some note mount play and hood scuffing.

    • Excellent sharpness and fast autofocus, often called the best value 70-200mm f/2.8.
    • Heavy and large; some find it fatiguing, but accept it for build quality.
    • Lens hood scuffs easily; minor mount play reported.
    • AF speed on adapted Sony E-mount can be slow for fast action.
  18. Q1 2019100/1005.0★4 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for its superb build quality, sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent value compared to Canon/Nikon alternatives.

    • Build quality is superb, feels even better than Canon/Nikon equivalents.
    • Image quality is outstanding: sharp edge-to-edge, zero chromatic aberration, beautiful bokeh.
    • Autofocus is insanely fast and accurate, even in challenging conditions.
    • Excellent value at nearly $1000 less than brand-name alternatives.

日付のある顧客レビュー 96 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。

実証データ

パフォーマンス

パフォーマンス偏差値

AF 53.9
Bokeh 32.8
Build 20.9
Macro 52.8
Optical 100
Aperture 20.2
User Sentiment 63.7
Versatility 79.4
ユーザー評価 72.5
Stabilization 99.9

スペック

全スペック一覧

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 70
Focal Length Max 200
Elements 20
Groups 15
Aspherical Elements 3
ED Elements 10
Coating Super Multi-Layer Coating

Aperture

Max Aperture f/22
Min Aperture f/2.8
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 11

Build

Mount Sony E
Format full-frame
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 1.3 kg / 3.0 lbs
Filter Thread 77

AF & Stabilization

AF Type HSM
Stabilization Yes
Stabilization Stops 7.5

Focus

Min Focus Distance 650
Max Magnification 1:5.2

競合製品との比較

Spec Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Viltrox Pro AF 27mm f/1.2
Focal Length 70-200mm 28-300mm 17-28mm 12-35mm 18-135mm 27mm
Max Aperture f/22 f/4 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/3.5 f/1.2
Mount Sony E Sony E Nikon Z Micro Four Thirds Sony E Sony E
Stabilization true true false true true false
Weather Sealed true true true true false true
Weight (g) 1345 590 450 306 326 560
AF Type HSM VXD linear motor Stepping Motor Autofocus Linear motor STM
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom prime
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
製品 AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilityユーザー評価Stabilization
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS 53.932.820.952.810020.263.779.472.599.9
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare 9877.965.185.896.76691.297.755.782.4
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Compare 86.88775.185.888.283.991.26869.636.8
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare 53.981.885.45186.583.963.780.685.496.9
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare 9875.472.440.378.577.344.795.889.882.4
Viltrox Pro AF 27mm f/1.2 Compare 86.898.567.438.582.298.691.233.689.836.8

価格

コストパフォーマンス

2026年5月3日からこの製品の価格を追跡しています。データが増えるとチャートが表示されます。

用途別スコア

Macro (68.6)総合 (67.1)Budget (68.7)Street (52.1)Travel (60.4)Portrait (47.3)Landscape (71.8)Professional (64.8)Video Cinema (70.6)Wildlife Sports (64.2)

類似製品