Samsung Neo QLED QN75QN80FAFXZA 75"
Samsung
55 Overall Score
vs
TCL G60K-IU 64.5"
TCL
31 Overall Score
Scores
Sports
Gaming
Budget
Streaming
Smart Home
Movies
Corporate
Outdoor
Portable
Specifications
| Samsung Neo QLED QN75QN80FAFXZA 75" | TCL G60K-IU 64.5" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 75" | 64.5" |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Panel Type | QD-Mini-LED★ | LED |
| Backlight | Mini-LED★ | Direct LED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Picture Quality | ||
| Brightness | — | 280 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 72% NTSC |
| Color Depth | — | 8-Bit+FRC★ |
| Motion Tech | VRR gaming at up to 4K 144Hz | — |
| Processor | NQ4 AI Gen2 Processor | AiPQ Image Processor |
| HDR | ||
| HDR Formats | Neo Quantum HDR | HDR10 |
| Dolby Vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| HDR10+ | ✗ | ✗ |
| HLG | ✗ | ✗ |
| Gaming | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| VRR | VRR | — |
| Game Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Smart TV | ||
| Platform | Tizen | Google TV |
| Voice Assistant | Alexa | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speaker Config | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wattage | — | 20W★ |
| Dolby Atmos | ✓★ | ✗ |
| eARC | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | — | 3★ |
| HDMI Version | 2.1★ | 2.0 |
| USB Ports | — | 1★ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2★ |
| Ethernet | ✓ | ✓ |
| Optical Audio | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 200x200 |
| Power & Size | ||
| Power | — | 145W★ |
| Weight | 33.52 kg | 12.20 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
Samsung Neo QLED QN75QN80FAFXZA 75"
- Strong picture quality (79th percentile)
- Strong gaming (75th percentile)
- Strong audio (72nd percentile)
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
TCL G60K-IU 64.5"
- Strong display (68th percentile)
- Below average picture quality (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average gaming (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average smart (32nd percentile)
Pricing
Samsung Neo QLED QN75QN80FAFXZA 75"0.046score per dollar
vs
TCL G60K-IU 64.5"0.062score per dollar
TCL G60K-IU 64.5" offers 1.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Neo QLED QN75QN80FAFXZA 75"
Scores 55 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 33 specs.
