Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm
Tamron
55 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
Fujifilm
79 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Street
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Portrait
Specifications
| Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 18 mm |
| Elements | — | 15 |
| Groups | — | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | XR Di VC | Super EBC coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/6.3 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | f/1.4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Fujifilm X |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.54 kg | 0.37 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Built in Motor | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 67 mm★ | 200 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:6.67★ |
Pros & Cons
Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average build (24th percentile)
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm0.092score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm0.075score per dollar
Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm offers 1.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
Scores 79 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
