Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Overall Score
vs
Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Meike
47 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Canon
97
Meike
40
Portrait
Canon
95
Meike
36
Video Cinema
Canon
90
Meike
30
Street
Canon
82
Meike
43
Travel
Canon
81
Meike
40
Wildlife Sports
Canon
77
Meike
27
Landscape
Canon
76
Meike
33
Professional
Canon
75
Meike
33
Macro
Canon
68
Meike
45

Specifications

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USMMeike 35mm f/1.4 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min18 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm35 mm
Elements168
Groups125
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper Spectra CoatingMulti-Layer Nano Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountCanon EF-SFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.52 kg0.22 kg
Filter Thread67 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMmanual focus only
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm400 mm
Max Magnification0.28x

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm

  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm is $250 cheaper (3.8x less).

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM0.267score per dollar
vs
Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm0.518score per dollar

Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm offers 1.9x better value for money

Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Verdict

Winner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider