Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
85 Overall Score
vs
Olympus Zuiko Digital 261056 40-150mm

Olympus Zuiko Digital 261056 40-150mm

Olympus
50 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Canon
97
Olympus
56
Portrait
Canon
89
Olympus
51
Video Cinema
Canon
89
Olympus
41
Street
Canon
80
Olympus
50
Travel
Canon
76
Olympus
45
Wildlife Sports
Canon
72
Olympus
40
Landscape
Canon
72
Olympus
35
Macro
Canon
71
Olympus
35
Professional
Canon
70
Olympus
38

Specifications

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USMOlympus Zuiko Digital 261056 40-150mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min18 mm40 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm150 mm
Elements16—
Groups12—
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements1★—
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.64.0-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountCanon EF-SMicro Four Thirds
FormatAPS-C★micro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed✗—
Weight0.52 kg0.32 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★—
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm★900 mm
Max Magnification0.28x★—

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Olympus Zuiko Digital 261056 40-150mm

  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (73rd percentile)
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Pricing

Olympus Zuiko Digital 261056 40-150mm is $109 cheaper (1.9x less).

Olympus Zuiko Digital 261056 40-150mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider