Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm
Meike
42 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Fujifilm
67 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Professional
Travel
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Portrait
Macro
Specifications
| Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 6 | 9 |
| Groups | 5 | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | Multi-Layer Nano Coating | Nano-GI coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.7 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 8 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.18 kg | 0.17 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm★ | 350 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.111x | 0.135x★ |
Pros & Cons
Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (67th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Pricing
Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm0.600score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm0.278score per dollar
Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm offers 2.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Scores 67 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
