Canon RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM
Canon
68 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
90 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Macro
Specifications
| Canon RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 10 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 18 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 12 | 19 |
| Groups | 10 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| ED Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| Coating | Super Spectra coating | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | 4.5-6.3 | 4-6.3 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.15 kg★ | 0.57 kg |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 140 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.23x | 0.28x★ |
Pros & Cons
Canon RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
Pricing
Canon RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM0.243score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.123score per dollar
Canon RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM offers 2.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
