Leica Tri Elmar-M 11626 16mm
Leica
24 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm
Panasonic
84 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Portrait
Street
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Macro
Video Cinema
Specifications
| Leica Tri Elmar-M 11626 16mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 20 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 21 mm | 60 mm |
| Elements | 4 | 11 |
| Groups | 4 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 2 |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 10★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Leica M | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.48 kg | 0.35 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 150 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.0625 | 0.43x★ |
Pros & Cons
Leica Tri Elmar-M 11626 16mm
- Strong versatility (67th percentile)
- Below average optical (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
- Below average macro (25th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong versatility (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
Pricing
Leica Tri Elmar-M 11626 16mm0.003score per dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm0.140score per dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm offers 46.7x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm
Scores 84 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
