Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm

Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm

Fujifilm
34 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
86
Fujifilm
40
Street
Sigma
86
Fujifilm
36
Macro
Sigma
82
Fujifilm
36
Portrait
Sigma
81
Fujifilm
22
Travel
Sigma
80
Fujifilm
48
Budget
Sigma
75
Fujifilm
34
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Fujifilm
29
Landscape
Sigma
71
Fujifilm
48
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Fujifilm
44

Specifications

Sigma 207975Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomzoom
Focal Length Min10 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm70 mm
Elements1311
Groups109
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements42
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/32
Min Aperturef/2.84.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountSony EFujifilm G
FormatAPS-Cmedium-format
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.44 kg
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAuto Focus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm350 mm
Max Magnification1:40.28x

Pros & Cons

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm

  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average social proof (32nd percentile)

Pricing

Sigma 207975 is $609 cheaper (2.1x less).

Sigma 2079750.158score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm0.030score per dollar

Sigma 207975 offers 5.3x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider