Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm 16664339

Fujifilm 16664339

Fujifilm
58 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
86
Fujifilm
75
Street
Sigma
86
Fujifilm
65
Portrait
Sigma
81
Fujifilm
84
Macro
Sigma
82
Fujifilm
46
Travel
Sigma
80
Fujifilm
40
Budget
Sigma
75
Fujifilm
56
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Fujifilm
67
Landscape
Sigma
71
Fujifilm
47
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Fujifilm
61

Specifications

Sigma 207975Fujifilm 16664339
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomprime
Focal Length Min10 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm50 mm
Elements1312
Groups109
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements42
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingWeather Resistant
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/1
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.85 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAuto Focus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm700 mm
Max Magnification1:40.08x

Pros & Cons

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Fujifilm 16664339

  • Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (72nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sigma 207975 is $1,259 cheaper (3.3x less).

Sigma 2079750.158score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm 166643390.032score per dollar

Sigma 207975 offers 4.9x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Fujifilm 16664339 Better at:

Portrait

Also Consider