Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm

Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm

Yongnuo
81 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
86
Yongnuo
89
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Yongnuo
87
Portrait
Sigma
81
Yongnuo
87
Street
Sigma
86
Yongnuo
86
Macro
Sigma
82
Yongnuo
75
Landscape
Sigma
71
Yongnuo
81
Travel
Sigma
80
Yongnuo
78
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Yongnuo
79
Budget
Sigma
75
Yongnuo
77

Specifications

Sigma 207975Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomzoom
Focal Length Min10 mm12 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm35 mm
Elements1314
Groups1011
Aspherical Elements14
ED Elements43
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingNano Surface Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony EMicro Four Thirds
FormatAPS-Cmicro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.32 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM stepping motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm250 mm
Max Magnification1:40.5x

Pros & Cons

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average social proof (35th percentile)

Pricing

Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm is $181 cheaper (1.5x less).

Sigma 2079750.158score per dollar
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm0.225score per dollar

Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm offers 1.4x better value for money

Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 1 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

Macro

Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm Better at:

PortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider