Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score
vs
Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm

Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm

Sony
55 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
86
Sony
57
Street
Sigma
86
Sony
56
Macro
Sigma
82
Sony
45
Portrait
Sigma
81
Sony
41
Travel
Sigma
80
Sony
60
Budget
Sigma
75
Sony
51
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Sony
47
Landscape
Sigma
71
Sony
59
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Sony
50

Specifications

Sigma 207975Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomprime
Focal Length Min10 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm35 mm
Elements137
Groups105
Aspherical Elements13
ED Elements41
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingZEISS T* Anti-Reflective Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread67 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm350 mm
Max Magnification1:40.24x

Pros & Cons

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm is $90 cheaper (1.2x less).

Sigma 2079750.158score per dollar
vs
Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm0.121score per dollar

Sigma 207975 offers 1.3x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider