Tamron A17-200 28-200mm
Tamron
45 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm
Fujifilm
81 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Travel
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Tamron A17-200 28-200mm | Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | standard-zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 13 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 33 mm |
| Elements | — | 10 |
| Groups | — | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.8 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 3.8-5.6 | f/6.3 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Adaptall | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.08 kg★ | 0.13 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 49 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | STM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 201 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.25x★ |
Pros & Cons
Tamron A17-200 28-200mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong aperture (76th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (74th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Pricing
Tamron A17-200 28-200mm0.138score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm0.336score per dollar
Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm offers 2.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm
Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 20 specs.
