Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Panasonic
64 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Panasonic
82
Sigma
86
Street
Panasonic
73
Sigma
86
Macro
Panasonic
54
Sigma
82
Portrait
Panasonic
73
Sigma
81
Travel
Panasonic
63
Sigma
80
Budget
Panasonic
66
Sigma
75
Video Cinema
Panasonic
71
Sigma
74
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
73
Sigma
66
Landscape
Panasonic
61
Sigma
71

Specifications

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mmSigma 207975
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle-zoom
Focal Length Min16 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm18 mm
Elements1213
Groups910
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements14
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/2.8
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountL-MountSony E
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.50 kg0.26 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typedouble-magnet linear motorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm117 mm
Max Magnification0.23x1:4

Pros & Cons

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong build (72nd percentile)

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma 207975 is $808 cheaper (2.5x less).

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm0.048score per dollar
vs
Sigma 2079750.158score per dollar

Sigma 207975 offers 3.3x better value for money

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm Better at:

Wildlife Sports

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema

Also Consider