Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Thypoch Eureka 28mm f/2.8 28mm
Thypoch
54 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Macro
Street
Travel
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Thypoch Eureka 28mm f/2.8 28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | — | 4 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | multi-layer nano coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Fujifilm X |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | — | 0.14 kg★ |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 400 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:2★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Thypoch Eureka 28mm f/2.8 28mm
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
vs
Thypoch Eureka 28mm f/2.8 28mm0.251score per dollar
Thypoch Eureka 28mm f/2.8 28mm offers 3.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Thypoch Eureka 28mm f/2.8 28mm
Scores 54 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 18 specs.
