Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
OM System M.Zuiko 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II

OM System M.Zuiko 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II

OM System
58 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
OM System
58
Portrait
Nikon
89
OM System
39
Street
Nikon
86
OM System
60
Budget
Nikon
86
OM System
62
Macro
Nikon
85
OM System
56
Landscape
Nikon
83
OM System
72
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
OM System
50
Travel
Nikon
75
OM System
82
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
OM System
59

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8OM System M.Zuiko 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm14 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm150 mm
Elements1315
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements32
CoatingMulti-CoatedZERO
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.84-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon ZMicro Four Thirds
Formatfull-framemicro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.28 kg
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm500 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:4.55

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

OM System M.Zuiko 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Pricing

OM System M.Zuiko 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II is $450 cheaper (1.7x less).

OM System M.Zuiko 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

OM System M.Zuiko 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II Better at:

Travel

Also Consider