Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM
Sigma
41 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 70 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 13 | — |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | — |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | leica_l |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 2.06 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
vs
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM0.025score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 3.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
