Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Thypoch TP-S28E-BLK

Thypoch TP-S28E-BLK

Thypoch
47 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Thypoch
39
Portrait
Nikon
89
Thypoch
46
Street
Nikon
86
Thypoch
43
Budget
Nikon
86
Thypoch
39
Macro
Nikon
85
Thypoch
52
Landscape
Nikon
83
Thypoch
42
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Thypoch
35
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Thypoch
29
Travel
Nikon
75
Thypoch
34

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Thypoch TP-S28E-BLK
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm28 mm
Elements1311
Groups117
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements31
CoatingMulti-Coatedmulti-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades914
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.34 kg
Filter Thread67 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm400 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Thypoch TP-S28E-BLK

  • Strong build (71st percentile)
  • Strong optical (65th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Thypoch TP-S28E-BLK is $651 cheaper (2.6x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
vs
Thypoch TP-S28E-BLK0.117score per dollar

Thypoch TP-S28E-BLK offers 1.3x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider