Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Art 28-105mm f/2.8 DG DN 105mm

Sigma Art 28-105mm f/2.8 DG DN 105mm

Sigma
81 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
87
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
88
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
74
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
83
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
72
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
84
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
75
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
73
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
75

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Art 28-105mm f/2.8 DG DN 105mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm105 mm
Elements1318
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements35
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-Coatedwater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades912
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg1.00 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorHLA
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm401 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:3.1

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Art 28-105mm f/2.8 DG DN 105mm

  • Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is $460 cheaper (1.4x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
vs
Sigma Art 28-105mm f/2.8 DG DN 105mm0.053score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.7x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports

Also Consider