Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
Fujifilm
63 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 140 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 23 |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3 | 6★ |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | Nano-GI and HT-EBC |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor | Triple linear motors★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong macro (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm0.033score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 2.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
