Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 668101 17-70mm

Sigma 668101 17-70mm

Sigma
70 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
52
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
66
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
51
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
66
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
73
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
41
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
59
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
47
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
46

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma 668101 17-70mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm70 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorHSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm70 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma 668101 17-70mm

  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average build (26th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma 668101 17-70mm is $551 cheaper (2.1x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
vs
Sigma 668101 17-70mm0.141score per dollar

Sigma 668101 17-70mm offers 1.6x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider