Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm
Canon
74 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Video Cinema
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 10 |
| Groups | 11 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 2 |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | Super Spectra coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Canon EF |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.89 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor | USM★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 914 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | 0.19x |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
- Below average macro (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
vs
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm0.174score per dollar
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
