Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG DN 24mm

Sigma Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG DN 24mm

Sigma
70 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
82
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
81
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
70
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
67
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
60
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
60
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
61
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
52

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG DN 24mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm24 mm
Elements1315
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Multilayer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorHSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.18x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG DN 24mm

  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong build (71st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG DN 24mm is $607 cheaper (2.4x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG DN 24mm0.158score per dollar

Sigma Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG DN 24mm offers 1.8x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider