Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Canon L RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM 35mm

Canon L RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM 35mm

Canon
72 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Canon
76
Portrait
Nikon
89
Canon
61
Street
Nikon
86
Canon
65
Budget
Nikon
86
Canon
66
Macro
Nikon
85
Canon
64
Landscape
Nikon
83
Canon
68
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Canon
73
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Canon
67
Travel
Nikon
75
Canon
53

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon L RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements1314
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements32
CoatingMulti-CoatedSub Wavelength Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountNikon ZCanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.56 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorNano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops7 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm280 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.21x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon L RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM 35mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Canon L RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM 35mm is $445 cheaper (1.7x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
vs
Canon L RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM 35mm0.120score per dollar

Canon L RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM 35mm offers 1.3x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider