Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Canon L RF 85mm f/1.2L USM 85mm

Canon L RF 85mm f/1.2L USM 85mm

Canon
53 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Canon
56
Portrait
Nikon
89
Canon
50
Street
Nikon
86
Canon
51
Budget
Nikon
86
Canon
58
Macro
Nikon
85
Canon
38
Landscape
Nikon
83
Canon
43
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Canon
52
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Canon
59
Travel
Nikon
75
Canon
39

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon L RF 85mm f/1.2L USM 85mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm85 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm85 mm
Elements138
Groups117
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements31
CoatingMulti-CoatedAir Sphere Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades98
Build
MountNikon ZCanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg1.19 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorUSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm950 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.12x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon L RF 85mm f/1.2L USM 85mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average build (27th percentile)
  • Below average macro (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is $949 cheaper (1.9x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
vs
Canon L RF 85mm f/1.2L USM 85mm0.027score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 3.3x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider