Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Tamron
68 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm
Viltrox
80 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Travel
Portrait
Budget
Landscape
Street
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm | Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 40 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 40 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 10 |
| Groups | 13 | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 2★ | — |
| Coating | Internal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/18 | f/2.5 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weight | 0.40 kg | 0.40 kg |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Auto Focus | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 450 mm | 40 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:3.7★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average aperture (34th percentile)
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm
- Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm0.757score per dollar
vs
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm0.474score per dollar
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm offers 1.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm
Scores 80 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 20 specs.
