Canon L EF 200-400mm IS USM Extender 1.4x 400mm
Canon
57 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC
Sigma
91 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Travel
Street
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Canon L EF 200-400mm IS USM Extender 1.4x 400mm | Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto-zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 400 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 400 mm | 40 mm |
| Elements | 25 | 17 |
| Groups | 20 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/1.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/32 | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Fujifilm X |
| Format | Full-Frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 3.62 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 2.00 m | 280 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.67 | 1:4.8 |
Pros & Cons
Canon L EF 200-400mm IS USM Extender 1.4x 400mm
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
- Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong aperture (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
Pricing
Canon L EF 200-400mm IS USM Extender 1.4x 400mm0.006score per dollar
vs
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC0.100score per dollar
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC offers 16.7x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
