Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm
Canon
60 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm
Fujifilm
81 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Travel
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm | Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | standard-zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 13 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 33 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 10 |
| Groups | 7 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | Super Spectra Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/6.3 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | — |
| Weight | 0.18 kg | 0.13 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 43 mm | 49 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM | STM |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 130 mm★ | 201 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.26x★ | 0.25x |
Pros & Cons
Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Pricing
Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm0.237score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm0.336score per dollar
Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm XC13-33mm F3.5-6.3f OIS 13-33mm
Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
