Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm
Fujifilm
50 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 60 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 60 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 13 |
| Groups | 8 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| Coating | Super EBC | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.21 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 39 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 267 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:2 | 1:5.26 |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong macro (76th percentile)
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm0.064score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
