Fujifilm XF27mmF2.8 R WR 107-457mm
Fujifilm
50 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Budget
Street
Macro
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Fujifilm XF27mmF2.8 R WR 107-457mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 107 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 457 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 7 | 13 |
| Groups | 5 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm G | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 39 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Automatic | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 340 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.26★ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm XF27mmF2.8 R WR 107-457mm
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (79th percentile)
- Strong macro (68th percentile)
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Fujifilm XF27mmF2.8 R WR 107-457mm0.111score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.087score per dollar
Fujifilm XF27mmF2.8 R WR 107-457mm offers 1.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
