Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm
31 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Fujifilm
39
Sigma
86
Street
Fujifilm
42
Sigma
86
Macro
Fujifilm
35
Sigma
82
Portrait
Fujifilm
22
Sigma
81
Travel
Fujifilm
41
Sigma
80
Budget
Fujifilm
33
Sigma
75
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
35
Sigma
74
Landscape
Fujifilm
36
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
35
Sigma
66

Specifications

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mmSigma 207975
Optics
Typeprimewide-angle-zoom
Focal Length Min35 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm18 mm
Elements813
Groups610
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements24
CoatingSuper EBCSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/35f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.19 kg0.26 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm117 mm
Max Magnification0.17x1:4

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm is $280 cheaper (2.1x less).

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm0.118score per dollar
vs
Sigma 2079750.158score per dollar

Sigma 207975 offers 1.3x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider