Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm
Panasonic
88 Overall Score
vs
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
Hasselblad
36 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Macro
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Specifications
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm | Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 100 mm | 100 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 16 |
| Groups | 11 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3 | 5★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 2.8-4 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Hasselblad XCD |
| Format | full-frame★ | medium-format |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.30 kg★ | 0.89 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 86 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Dual phase linear motor★ | stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 204 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:1 | 1:4.0 |
Pros & Cons
Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
- Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average build (21st percentile)
Pricing
Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm0.103score per dollar
vs
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E0.008score per dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm offers 12.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 20 specs.
