TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm

TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm

TTArtisan
52 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR 50mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR 50mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Street
TTArtisan
59
Nikon
99
Budget
TTArtisan
53
Nikon
93
Travel
TTArtisan
49
Nikon
89
Portrait
TTArtisan
47
Nikon
86
Landscape
TTArtisan
41
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
TTArtisan
43
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
43
Nikon
81
Professional
TTArtisan
45
Nikon
78
Macro
TTArtisan
53
Nikon
70

Specifications

TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mmNikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR 50mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm50 mm
Elements109
Groups77
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements21
CoatingSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.83.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.18 kg0.14 kg
Filter Thread52 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusStepping Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance399 mm200 mm
Max Magnification0.2x

Pros & Cons

TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR 50mm

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Pricing

TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm is $87 cheaper (1.9x less).

TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR 50mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR 50mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider