Opteka 420-800mm 420-1600mm
Opteka
28 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm
Viltrox
80 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Specifications
| Opteka 420-800mm 420-1600mm | Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | super-telephoto | — |
| Focal Length Min | 420 mm | 40 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 1600 mm | 40 mm |
| Elements | 4 | 10 |
| Groups | 2 | 6 |
| Coating | HD Coated Glass | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/8.3 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weight | 0.52 kg | 0.40 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.60 m | 40 mm★ |
Pros & Cons
Opteka 420-800mm 420-1600mm
- Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (68th percentile)
- Below average optical (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm
- Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Opteka 420-800mm 420-1600mm0.275score per dollar
vs
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm0.474score per dollar
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm offers 1.7x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm
Scores 80 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
