Sigma TC-1401

Sigma TC-1401

Sigma
46 Overall Score
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
44
Sony
100
Street
Sigma
58
Sony
89
Travel
Sigma
49
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
51
Sony
84
Portrait
Sigma
53
Sony
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
49
Sony
83
Professional
Sigma
48
Sony
73
Landscape
Sigma
36
Sony
73
Macro
Sigma
27
Sony
69

Specifications

Sigma TC-1401Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min—18 mm
Focal Length Max—135 mm
Elements716
Groups512
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements12★
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/3.5
Min Aperture—3.5-5.6
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountNikon FSony E
Format—APS-C★
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.19 kg★0.33 kg
Filter Thread—55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Linear motor★
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance—450 mm★
Max Magnification1.4 x★0.29x

Pros & Cons

Sigma TC-1401

  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average social proof (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Pricing

Sigma TC-1401 is $448 cheaper (2.3x less).

Sigma TC-14010.130score per dollar
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.112score per dollar

Sigma TC-1401 offers 1.2x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider