KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mm

KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mm

KIPON
34 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

Scores

Video Cinema
KIPON
35
Tamron
99
Professional
KIPON
33
Tamron
97
Budget
KIPON
28
Tamron
97
Travel
KIPON
24
Tamron
92
Macro
KIPON
39
Tamron
92
Portrait
KIPON
36
Tamron
91
Landscape
KIPON
25
Tamron
89
Street
KIPON
32
Tamron
81
Wildlife Sports
KIPON
22
Tamron
80

Specifications

KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mmTamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min50 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm70 mm
Elements16
Groups12
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingNot explicitly statedFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.5f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades109
Build
MountCanon RFFujifilm X
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.50 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyRXD
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:4.8

Pros & Cons

KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mm

  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD is $490 cheaper (1.8x less).

KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mm0.031score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.170score per dollar

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD offers 5.5x better value for money

KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mm

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Verdict

Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider