KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mm

KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mm

KIPON
34 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
KIPON
33
Nikon
95
Portrait
KIPON
36
Nikon
89
Street
KIPON
32
Nikon
86
Budget
KIPON
28
Nikon
86
Macro
KIPON
39
Nikon
85
Landscape
KIPON
25
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
KIPON
35
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
KIPON
22
Nikon
78
Travel
KIPON
24
Nikon
75

Specifications

KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min50 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm28 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingNot explicitly statedMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.5f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades109
Build
MountCanon RFNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.50 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mm

  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mm0.031score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 2.9x better value for money

KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 50mm

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider