Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

Tamron
46 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
86
Tamron
53
Portrait
Nikon
79
Tamron
29
Street
Nikon
75
Tamron
36
Macro
Nikon
73
Tamron
49
Travel
Nikon
71
Tamron
47
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Tamron
29
Landscape
Nikon
68
Tamron
37
Professional
Nikon
66
Tamron
28
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
65
Tamron
35

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmTamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm250 mm
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/18
Min Aperture3.5-5.63.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountNikon FCanon AF
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.48 kg0.42 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-S
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm250 mm
Max Magnification1:3.5

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (66th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average aperture (34th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm is $160 cheaper (1.7x less).

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.371score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm0.114score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm offers 3.3x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 19 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider