Fujifilm XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR 70-300mm
Fujifilm
69 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Fujifilm XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR 70-300mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 70 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 13 |
| Groups | 12 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | 4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.58 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Linear motor★ | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 830 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.33x | 1:5.26★ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR 70-300mm
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Fujifilm XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR 70-300mm0.073score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
