Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF Telephoto 200mm
Laowa
54 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Specifications
| Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF Telephoto 200mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 200 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 16 |
| Groups | 9 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 5★ |
| Coating | — | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Format | Full-Frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.54 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Stepping AF Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.50 m | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.55★ |
Pros & Cons
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF Telephoto 200mm
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Pricing
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF Telephoto 200mm0.027score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.103score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm offers 3.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
