Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm
Hasselblad
33 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 38 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 38 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 13 |
| Groups | 9 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3 | 3 |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Hasselblad X | Nikon Z |
| Format | medium-format | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | linear stepping motor | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.2 | 1:5.26 |
Pros & Cons
Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (74th percentile)
- Strong macro (71st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm0.009score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 10.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
