Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm
Fujifilm
58 Overall Score
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Yongnuo
81 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Street
Landscape
Video Cinema
Travel
Budget
Macro
Specifications
| Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm | Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 12 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 14 |
| Groups | 8 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | Super EBC | Nano Surface Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | APS-C★ | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.15 kg★ | 0.32 kg |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | stepping motor | STM stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 170 mm★ | 250 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:7.7★ | 0.5x |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm
- Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (65th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average social proof (35th percentile)
Pricing
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm0.129score per dollar
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm0.225score per dollar
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm offers 1.7x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
