Sigma 346306 50mm

Sigma 346306 50mm

Sigma
30 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
25
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
30
Nikon
94
Travel
Sigma
27
Nikon
92
Landscape
Sigma
30
Nikon
88
Professional
Sigma
34
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
28
Nikon
82
Street
Sigma
29
Nikon
81
Portrait
Sigma
17
Nikon
78
Macro
Sigma
64
Nikon
74

Specifications

Sigma 346306 50mmNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min50 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm200 mm
Elements1019
Groups915
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—1★
CoatingSuper Multi CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountNikon FNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.32 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread55 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—stepping motor★
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance188 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification1:1★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Sigma 346306 50mm

  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (73rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Pricing

Sigma 346306 50mm is $485 cheaper (3.0x less).

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider