FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
FotoZ
74 Overall Score
vs
Arducam LN052 35mm
Arducam
40 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Street
Travel
Budget
Portrait
Landscape
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| FotoZ KZ-03 24mm | Arducam LN052 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 24 mm | 35 mm |
| Coating | nano-coatings | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.6 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 12★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | C Mount |
| Format | — | micro-four-thirds |
| Weight | 0.12 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 16 mm★ | 35 mm |
| Max Magnification | 10X★ | — |
Pros & Cons
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
- Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
Arducam LN052 35mm
- Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm1.689score per dollar
vs
Arducam LN052 35mm0.993score per dollar
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm offers 1.7x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 16 specs.
