FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
FotoZ
72 Overall Score
vs
JJC LH-XF27 39mm
JJC
40 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Street
Budget
Travel
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| FotoZ KZ-03 24mm | JJC LH-XF27 39mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | — |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 39 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 24 mm | 39 mm |
| Coating | nano-coatings | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/27 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | for Fujifilm XF 23mm F2.8 R WR, for Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR |
| Weight | 0.12 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 39 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 16 mm★ | 23 mm |
| Max Magnification | 10X★ | — |
Pros & Cons
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
- Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong versatility (68th percentile)
JJC LH-XF27 39mm
- Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average bokeh (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm1.574score per dollar
vs
JJC LH-XF27 39mm2.201score per dollar
JJC LH-XF27 39mm offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
Scores 72 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 11 specs.
