Viltrox S 56mm T1.5 56mm

Viltrox S 56mm T1.5 56mm

Viltrox
38 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Viltrox
36
Nikon
95
Portrait
Viltrox
42
Nikon
89
Street
Viltrox
34
Nikon
86
Budget
Viltrox
27
Nikon
86
Macro
Viltrox
47
Nikon
85
Landscape
Viltrox
34
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Viltrox
41
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
30
Nikon
78
Travel
Viltrox
25
Nikon
75

Specifications

Viltrox S 56mm T1.5 56mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typestandardzoom
Focal Length Min56 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm28 mm
Elements1013
Groups911
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements13
Coatingnano multi-layer coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.5f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades149
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.54 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance630 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Viltrox S 56mm T1.5 56mm

  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average social proof (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Viltrox S 56mm T1.5 56mm is $635 cheaper (2.5x less).

Viltrox S 56mm T1.5 56mm

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider