TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Overall Score
vs
Philips A1105BK

Philips A1105BK

Philips
37 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
TOZO
81
Philips
43
Gaming
TOZO
81
Philips
35
Travel
TOZO
75
Philips
26
Fitness
TOZO
74
Philips
38
Commute
TOZO
70
Philips
26
Music
TOZO
70
Philips
36
Calls
TOZO
66
Philips
24

Specifications

TOZO Crystal PodsPhilips A1105BK
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessear-hook
Ear TipsMedium—
Weight0.04 kg0.02 kg★
Audio
Driver Typedynamicneodymium
Driver Size10 mm15 mm★
Drivers2★—
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB★—
Hi-Res Audio✓★—
CodecsLDAC—
SurroundStereo, Surround—
Noise Control
ANC✓★—
ANC Typehybrid—
Transparency✓★—
Connectivity
Wireless✓★—
Bluetooth5.4★—
Multipoint✓★—
Wired Connector—3.5mm
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs★—
Charge Time2 hrs★—
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play—
ChargingUSB-C★—
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs★—
Case ChargingUSB-C★—
Wireless Charging✓★—
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count4★—
NC Mic✓★—
Features
Voice AssistantOther—
Touch Controls✓★—
AppTOZO App—
Gaming Mode✓★—
Bone Conduction✗—
Water ResistanceIPX5IPX2

Pros & Cons

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong sound (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile

Philips A1105BK

  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong sound (69th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (25th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Pricing

Philips A1105BK is $12 cheaper (1.7x less).

TOZO Crystal Pods2.841score per dollar
vs
Philips A1105BK2.029score per dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods offers 1.4x better value for money

Philips A1105BK

Verdict

★ Winner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 38 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider