ACEMAGIC K1 Silver 2025
ACEMAGIC
48 Overall Score
vs
Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 Black 2025
Dell
86 Overall Score
Scores
Business
Home Office
Developer
Workstation
Compact
Gaming
Ai Llm
Creator
Specifications
| ACEMAGIC K1 | Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen 3 4300U | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 4 | 10★ |
| Frequency | 2.7 GHz★ | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 30 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | AMD Radeon Graphics★ | Intel UHD Graphics |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | integrated★ |
| VRAM | 16 GB★ | 8 GB |
| VRAM Type | — | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 64 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | 256 GB | 3.9 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD★ | SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mini | mid-tower |
| PSU | — | 180W★ |
| Weight | 0.50 kg | 5.45 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB Ports | 6 | 7★ |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.0 | 1x HDMI |
| DisplayPort | 1x DP 1.4 | 1x DisplayPort |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6★ |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4★ |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Pro |
Pros & Cons
ACEMAGIC K1 Silver 2025
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (76th percentile)
- Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average cpu (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average ram (21st percentile)
- Below average storage (21st percentile)
Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 Black 2025
- Strong storage (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ram (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong cpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average gpu (35th percentile)
Pricing
ACEMAGIC K1 Silver 20250.161score per dollar
vs
Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 Black 20250.115score per dollar
ACEMAGIC K1 Silver 2025 offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250
Scores 86 overall, wins 5 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 25 specs.
