ACEMAGIC M5 Blue 2026
ACEMAGIC
48 Overall Score
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
HP
96 Overall Score
Scores
Gaming
Developer
Creator
Home Office
Business
Workstation
Ai Llm
Compact
Specifications
| ACEMAGIC M5 | HP OMEN GT16-0364 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core i7 14650HX★ | AMD Ryzen 7 8700F |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 16★ | 8 |
| Frequency | 2.2 GHz | 4.1 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB★ | 16 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | Intel Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 12 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mini | mid-tower |
| PSU | — | 850W★ |
| Weight | 1.35 kg | 14.50 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| USB Ports | 6 | 8★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | 0 |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI | 1 x HDMI |
| DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort | 3 x DisplayPort |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home |
Pros & Cons
ACEMAGIC M5 Blue 2026
- Strong cpu (72nd percentile)
- Strong port selection (71st percentile)
- Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile
Pricing
ACEMAGIC M5 Blue 20260.072score per dollar
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.053score per dollar
ACEMAGIC M5 Blue 2026 offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364
Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 9 of 26 specs.
