SJCAM C400

SJCAM C400

SJCAM
50 Overall Score
vs
CHEOTIME White

CHEOTIME White

CHEOTIME
38 Overall Score

Scores

Youtube
SJCAM
62
CHEOTIME
46
Video
SJCAM
57
CHEOTIME
43
Vlogging
SJCAM
53
CHEOTIME
34
Beginner
SJCAM
51
CHEOTIME
39
Product Photography
SJCAM
45
CHEOTIME
51
Streaming
SJCAM
48
CHEOTIME
36
Wedding Events
SJCAM
47
CHEOTIME
34
Travel
SJCAM
47
CHEOTIME
23
Sports Wildlife
SJCAM
45
CHEOTIME
27
Photography
SJCAM
42
CHEOTIME
41

Specifications

SJCAM C400CHEOTIME
Sensor
TypeCMOS—
Megapixels—64 MP★
Video
Max Resolution4K4K
Log Profile✓✓
CodecMP4—
Display & EVF
Screen Size2.3"3"★
Touchscreen✓★—
Articulating✓✓
Build
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.78 kg★—
Connectivity
Wi-Fi✓✓
Bluetooth✗—

Pros & Cons

SJCAM C400

  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong display (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (78th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (29th percentile)
  • Below average burst (34th percentile)

CHEOTIME White

  • Strong sensor (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong display (72nd percentile)
  • Strong video (70th percentile)
  • Below average burst (34th percentile)

Pricing

CHEOTIME White is $106 cheaper (2.6x less).

SJCAM C4000.292score per dollar
vs
CHEOTIME White0.596score per dollar

CHEOTIME White offers 2.0x better value for money

SJCAM C400

CHEOTIME White

Verdict

★ Winner: SJCAM C400

Scores 50 overall, wins 8 of 10 usage categories and 3 of 12 specs.

SJCAM C400 Better at:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingWedding EventsSports Wildlife

CHEOTIME Better at:

Product Photography

Also Consider